Journal article
2014
APA
Click to copy
Munro, K. R., Flood, N. J., McKellar, A., & Reudink, M. (2014). Female mate preference varies with age and environmental conditions.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Munro, Kurtis R., Nancy J. Flood, A. McKellar, and M. Reudink. “Female Mate Preference Varies with Age and Environmental Conditions” (2014).
MLA
Click to copy
Munro, Kurtis R., et al. Female Mate Preference Varies with Age and Environmental Conditions. 2014.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{kurtis2014a,
title = {Female mate preference varies with age and environmental conditions},
year = {2014},
author = {Munro, Kurtis R. and Flood, Nancy J. and McKellar, A. and Reudink, M.}
}
Sexual selection and mate choice are dynamic processes that can be influenced by a variety of environmental and social factors, which have been well studied in a range of taxa. However, in humans, the environmental factors that influence regional variation in preference for mate attributes remain poorly understood. In addition, underlying variation based on individual age may strongly influence mate preferences. In this study, we examined written descriptions of preferred mates from the online dating profiles of 1111 women from 26 cities across Canada. We grouped the words describing preferred mates into four categories: resource holding potential, physical attractiveness, activities and interests, and emotional appeal. We then asked whether variation in environmental (sex ratio, population size and population density), economic (population income) and individual factors (age) predicted variation in the relative importance of these four categories of female mate preference. Sex ratio was the best predictor of preference for the physical attractiveness and the activities and interests of potential mates, with women in male-biased cities placing more emphasis on physical attractiveness and less emphasis on activities and interests. Age was the best predictor of preference for resource holding potential, with younger individuals placing more emphasis on this trait. No factors were strong predictors of variation in preference for emotional appeal, perhaps because this trait was highly valued in all populations. This work supports a growing body of literature demonstrating that mate choice and mate preferences are often dynamic and can be influenced by individual and environmental variation.